Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Tristan Lamasine Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tseng vs Lamasine analysis and find out who is favored!
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Tristan Lamasine Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tseng has won 50.77% of points on his second serve, while Lamasine has won 49.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tseng, in recent form, has won 51.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lamasine has won 50.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.33% and 32.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tseng has saved 62.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lamasine has saved 54.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tseng has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 30/ 24), with Lamasine winning 66.67% (W/L 58/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tseng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 98/ 62), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Lamasine has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 61), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 175/ 156).
- Player level: In the last year, Tseng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 25/ 20), where as Lamasine has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.62% of matches (W/L 31/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tseng winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Tseng winning 2 and Lamasine winning 2. The last match between Tseng and Lamasine was at the Oeiras 3 Challenger, 15-04-2024, Q3, Clay with Chun Hsin Tseng getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tseng and Lamasine have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tseng winning 0 times and Lamasine 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tseng winning 0, and Lamasine 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tseng has played against opponents with an average rank of 348.44 while Lamasine has played against players with an average rank of 247.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tseng has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lamasine has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tseng has converted 42.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lamasine has converted 44.87% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tseng 1 - 1 Lamasine
248
Rank
83
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
280
Rank
181
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
59% (210-144)
Career Total W/L
55% (422-342)
59% (17-12)
YTD W/L
55% (21-17)
$180,215
Career Prize Money
$160,780
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Tristan Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 16 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:29 | 1:14:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (59/110) | 58% (48/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (38/59) | 73% (35/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (21/51) | 43% (15/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (33/83) | 46% (51/110) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Tristan Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (17/12) | 55% (21/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (35/33) | 52% (45/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (326/320) | 51% (427/412) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 33% (4/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 65% (17/9) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 90 | 108 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 84 | 110 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:35 | 1:39:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 340.38 | 243.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (1126/2101) | 62% (1610/2588) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (786/1126) | 69% (1106/1610) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (495/975) | 49% (483/978) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (83/194) | 45% (105/234) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (800/2054) | 39% (1038/2628) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (17/11) | 55% (21/17) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (16/28) | 54% (20/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 50% (6/12) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 90% (20/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 10% (20/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (17/5) | 17% (18/3) |
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Elias Ymer
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Joao Domingues
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Titouan Droguet
33%
(
4 of
12)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tristan Lamasine Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Tristan Lamasine
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Tristan Lamasine
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Youssef Boubaker
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tristan Lamasine
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Tristan Lamasine
54%
(
52 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Arthur Weber
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Tristan Lamasine
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Jiri Vesely
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tseng Vs Lamasine Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
